https://lawcolloquy.com//assets/img/law_logo.png

LAW COLLOQUY

Blog

Case Reviews

Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal: Right to Information and Judicial Independence

Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal: Right to Information and Judicial Independence

The citizen’s Right to Know is one of the significant ingredients of a democratic country. India demands transparent and accountable government to establish open and good governance. The sovereignty of India lies with ‘the people of India’. We choose our own representative therefore; it is our right to know about the machinery of the country. The need to control the mal administration of the government is important. Right to Information Act was formulated in 2005 which comes within the ambit of Article 19(1)(A) of the Constitution of India which ensures the fundamental right to Freedom of Speech and Expression. Many landmark judgments elaborated and clarified the concept of open governance. In the modern era, people are more vigil about their rights and they constitute the democracy. So, they expect the government to deliver. Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal, 2019, it was held by the Constitution Bench of Supreme Court that Supreme Court comes under the scope of “public authority”. Therefore, it is covered under Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act). It is one of the landmark judgments which took a limelight in recent years.

Biological Age cannot be inclusive of Mental Age

Biological Age cannot be inclusive of Mental Age

The judiciary is racing towards the liberal interpretation from the strict interpretation of the laws, statutes, and provisions and so on.

https://lawcolloquy.com//assets/img/icons/download.jpg
06-October-2020
The curious case of Enola Holmes

The curious case of Enola Holmes

Intellectual Property Rights is the cornerstone of development and enhancement of contemporary literature, performing arts and technology.

https://lawcolloquy.com//assets/img/icons/download.jpg
06-October-2020
Case analysis of Rewe-Zentral AG v Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein (Cassis de Dijon judgment)

Case analysis of Rewe-Zentral AG v Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein (Cassis de Dijon judgment)

The Cassis de Dijon Judgement is a landmark judgement on the concept of free movement of goods.

https://lawcolloquy.com//assets/img/icons/download.jpg
06-October-2020
Case Analysis of El Masri v. The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

Case Analysis of El Masri v. The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

The ECtHR, in 2012, held that the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia had violated Articles 3, 5, 8 as well as 13 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR)...

https://lawcolloquy.com//assets/img/icons/download.jpg
06-October-2020
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 vs Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 vs Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

The Indian legislation provides for a various number of laws, but there may come a time when there might occur conflict between the legislations.

https://lawcolloquy.com//assets/img/icons/download.jpg
06-October-2020
Daughter's Right To Ancestral Property: What You Need to Know

Daughter's Right To Ancestral Property: What You Need to Know

In a landmark judgment, recorded on, August 11th, 2020, the Supreme Court expanded on the rights of Hindu women as legal heirs to ancestral property.

https://lawcolloquy.com//assets/img/icons/download.jpg
06-October-2020
IS IT ALLOWED TO HAVE A SECOND BITE AT THE CHERRY?

IS IT ALLOWED TO HAVE A SECOND BITE AT THE CHERRY?

In the above-mentioned case, the judgment was pronounced in the Delhi High Court by Hon'ble Ms Justice Jyoti Singh.

https://lawcolloquy.com//assets/img/icons/download.jpg
06-October-2020
Reservation for Promotion: Is the State Bound to Provide It?

Reservation for Promotion: Is the State Bound to Provide It?

After independence, the rights of a minority was continued to be safeguarded, but significant changes happened in 1979 with the Mandal Commission Report which called for a change to admissions to institutes of higher education, except where states already had more generous requirements.

https://lawcolloquy.com//assets/img/icons/download.jpg
06-October-2020
NO PRE-ADMISSION ENQUIRY BY ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY REGARDING PROOF OF DEFAULT

NO PRE-ADMISSION ENQUIRY BY ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY REGARDING PROOF OF DEFAULT

The Hon'ble National Company Law Tribunal (

https://lawcolloquy.com//assets/img/icons/download.jpg
06-October-2020