The Supreme Court Said That The Marriage Certificate Issued By Arya Samaj is Illegal: Explainer
The Supreme Court declared the marriage certificate issued by Arya Samaj is illegal. A marriage certificate is a document that declares two people married legally. In India marriages are register in two ways; either, under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 or the Special Marriage Act, 1954. Honorable Supreme Court in the year 2006, made it mandatory in India to get a marriage registered to legalize it. This blog explains the validation of marriage certificate and procedure of registration of marriage in India.
GRIM REALITY OF SPORTS IN INDIA
Sport refers to an activity that involves physical and mental abilities. Sports have always been a vital part of human lives. Sports in India range from traditional, common, and famous sports like kabaddi, cricket, hockey, etc., and some other sports which are not known to many people. India has performed tremendously in the realm of sports and has been hosting plenty of domestic and international sports events as well. It has earned many awards in global spaces like the Olympics, commonwealth games, etc. In addition, India encourages the youth and has opened various universities for the same.Despite everything, India still lacks in the area. India faces problems that are still unrecognized and are not acted upon, even if recognized. The roots of the issues are hard to reach consideration yet can be done. The problems start and keep going on and probably never end. However, recognition is our duty, and acting on them is our right; hence let us move on to the grim reality of sports in India.
Customs As Per Hindu Law
Most of the Hindu law is based on customs and practices followed by the people across the country. Customs was considered as a supreme law and in ancient times, the Kings used to give decisions based on customs after due religious consideration. This manuscript describes customs as per Hindu Law in detail.
CASE ANALYSIS OF B.P. SINGHAL V. UNION OF INDIA
On the suggestion of the Council of Ministers, the President of India removed the Governors of Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, and Uttar Pradesh on July 2, 2004. As a result, a writ petition in the form of a Public Interest Litigation was filed, requesting the reinstatement of the abovementioned Governors of the States. A Governor of a State is appointed by the President of India and serves 'during the pleasure of the President,' according to Articles 155 and 156 of The Constitution of India, 1949. In most cases, a Governor can stay in office for a maximum of five years. However, Article 74 requires the President to act on the advice of the Council and the facts that led to the Governors' removal. Second, a Writ of Certiorari was filed, demanding the quashing of the same order, as well as a Writ of Mandamus, requesting the removal of Ministers, allowing the Governor to continue in office in accordance with the wishes of the Central Government in power. In the current case, the petitioner first demanded the production of papers and then that the four Governors be permitted to serve out the remainder of their five-year terms. This case was heard by a four-judge constitutional bench of India's Supreme Court.