LAW COLLOQUY

View

View Post

The Long Arm of Justice: Historical and Contemporary Approaches to War Crimes Prosecution

The Long Arm of Justice: Historical and Contemporary Approaches to War Crimes Prosecution


                  	

Introduction

War crimes are one of the most heinous acts in human history and are a clear violation of the standards of humanity even amid warfare. These gross and systematic human rights violations that include murder, torture, and the use of force against civilians cannot be ignored or go unpunished.

It is essential to understand war crimes for several reasons. It guarantees justice for the victims and survivors of the abuses perpetrated against them and offers a way of seeking compensation and recovery. Punishing the offenders also plays a role in sending a message to the rest of society that evil deeds will not be condoned. International law, including the Geneva Conventions, checks on the worst aspects of war and ensures the rights of people are not violated.

It also serves the interest of global peace and security by preventing future occurrences of war and ensuring that those that are to happen are conducted legally. Combating war crimes contributes to the non-recognition of impunity, which is why accountability cannot be avoided. Informing people about war crimes helps to remember the events and care for human rights. Attempts to study and prosecute war criminals build up international structures such as the International Criminal Court, which is crucial in the pursuit of justice. Therefore, the understanding of war crimes is vital to encourage justice and accountability as well as create a less barbaric society.

In exploring the details of war crimes, our goal is not only to expose these heinous acts but also to emphasise the need to address them to serve justice, prevent them, and protect core human rights. This blog analyses the nature of war crimes and the role of their study in fostering a more just and humane global society.

What is a war crime?

A war crime is any act committed during or in connection with a war that violates accepted international rules of warfare. These actions are considered criminal because they go against established wartime standards and laws. In the modern era, war crimes can include murder, torture, unjustified destruction, slavery, inhumane treatment of prisoners, or taking hostages.

What is the legal framework of war crime?

War crimes are grounded in international treaties, customary international law, and judicial decisions. These include the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols, which emphasise the humanitarian conduct of hostilities, and the Hague Conventions, which address the laws of war. The Rome Statute outlines the definition of war crimes and the International Criminal Court (ICC) jurisdiction.

The Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols:

The Geneva Conventions are a collection of agreements establishing the legal guidelines for how parties involved in a conflict should treat individuals and property not actively participating in the fighting. These conventions provide specific protections for the sick and injured, the shipwrecked, prisoners of war, and civilians.

The Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949:

The 1977 Additional Protocols provide enhanced protection for internal armed conflict victims and prohibit specific warfare methods.

Role Of International Criminal Court:

The International Criminal Court (ICC) was established in 2002 to hold accountable those responsible for some of the world’s most serious crimes. Supporters of the court argue that it works to deter potential war criminals, strengthen the rule of law, and provide justice to victims of atrocities.

What are the types of War Crimes?

War crime consists of a weird range of heinous acts, which include:

1. Wilful Killing: This refers to the intentional killing of civilians and combatants who are no longer participating in hostilities.

2. Torture and Inhuman Treatment: This involves inflicting severe physical or mental pain on individuals.

3. Unlawful Deportation or Transfer: This refers to the forcible removal of civilians from their homes without justification.

4. Taking Hostages: This refers to the act of seizing individuals to compel actions from a third party.

5. Intentionally Targeting Civilians: This refers to direct attacks on civilian populations and objects.

Historical Example

The Nuremberg and Tokyo Trials

The Nuremberg and Tokyo Trials were post–World War II military tribunals held to prosecute major war criminals. The Nuremberg Trials held in Germany in 1945-1946 by the Allied powers accused the prominent leaders of Nazi Germany of crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. They sentenced twelve to death and others to various years of imprisonment. The Tokyo Trials, which took place in Japan from 1946 to 1948, also tried Japanese military and political figures for war crimes, including the Rape of Nanking and the use of slave labour, resulting in seven hangings and several life terms. These trials set important legal principles regarding international criminal law and the prosecution of war crimes.

Post-Nuremberg War Crimes Framework:

After the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials, international treaties were established to define war crimes comprehensively. The 1949 Geneva Conventions made certain acts punishable, providing protection for wounded and sick military personnel, prisoners of war, and civilians. Similar to the Genocide Convention, these treaties required individual governments to conduct trials. Two protocols were added in 1977 to strengthen the Conventions, with the second protocol offering greater protection to guerrilla combatants in internal conflicts and wars of "self-determination."

Challenges in protecting war crime

Prosecuting war crimes is challenging for several reasons. Collecting evidence in conflict areas is complex and risky. Politicians might interfere with court processes, leading to unfair justice and making it seem like some countries are being unfairly targeted. Also, with new technologies and strategies, warfare is constantly changing, which means its laws also change.

Impact of war crimes on the victims and communities

It is important to emphasise that understanding and addressing war crimes have significant implications. They provide hope and a voice to the victims and survivors, aiding their recovery. Holding individuals accountable also deters such actions, as it communicates that there will be repercussions for their behaviour. Adhering to international law is essential for upholding human rights and preventing further atrocities during conflicts. Taking measures to prosecute war crimes also contributes to upholding global peace and order, discouraging future wars and promoting adherence to legal principles.

Conclusion

War crimes highlight the seriousness of violations of international human rights. The commission of war impacts victims and societies mentally and physically. War affects those who have no role in the conflict. Throughout history, from world wars to minor disputes between countries, it has affected innocent people and taken their lives. It is time to address these crimes through a robust legal framework and mechanisms and provide justice to create a more just and humane society. Understanding war crimes can contribute to human rights, accountability, and global peace."

Disclaimer: Kindly note that the views and opinions expressed are of the author(s), not Law Colloquy.

 References:

https://www.redcross.org/content/dam/redcross/atg/PDF_s/International_Services/International_Humanitarian_Law/IHL_SummaryGenevaConv.pdf

https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/roleicc#:~:text=The%20International%20Criminal%20Court%20was,over%20the%20court%20still%20rages.&text=The%20Hague%2Dbased%20ICC%20seeks,as%20genocide%20and%20war%20crimes.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/war-crime


Tags